The weight is enough, however, that care must be takes not to tip the monitor screen to far backwards. It seals out ambient light better than any other sensor we have used. The comparatively huge size of the Discus is an advantage when performing measurements. If you are choosing one to pack in a bag for on-location shooting, the i1Display is the obvious choice. The i1Display Pro looks positively tiny by comparison. The counterweight - slightly smaller than the sensor itself - is an actual hockey puck. Is the extra cost worth it? Handling:įirst, let's look at the contenders. $1300 for the Discus, $250 for the i1Display Pro (alternatively known as the i1Display 3). The street price differential between the competing sensors is not minor. The mean measurement error of the Discus was consistently lower than that of the X-Rite sensors, but only by a fraction of a Delta-E 2000 (one dE-2000 approximates the minimum visible color difference under ideal conditions). We noted an advantage in measurement accuracy for the Discus over the i1Display Pro/ColorMunki Display. Our evaluations of monitor calibration sensors showed the X-Rite i1Display Pro, ColorMunki Display, and the BasICColor Discus to be the best display measurement options available. X-Rite i1Display Pro: Measurement accuracy
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |